35 So. 3d 279 - Abney v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 983 So. 2d 798 - Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. · State ex rel. R.C. · 661 So. 2d 1052 - Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace · Guidry v. Bank of LaPlace · Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b)ecause a preponderance of the ■ evidence cannot be determined fairly from the cold record due to the substantial conflict in testimony on the condition of the single stop sign situated in the right-of-way that buttressed’ the gas station, remand is proper in this case.”); • Palumbo v. Shapiro, 11-0769, p. 12 (La.App. 4 Cir. 12/14/11), 81 So.3d 923, 930 , writ denied, 12-0140 (La.3/23/12), 85 So,3d 93 (reasoning that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.