Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 SO3D 47 - Cox v. State

Cox v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Knight v. State · 790 So. 2d 1071 - Major League Baseball v. Morsani · Harrell v. State · Florida Bar · 722 So. 2d 905 - Garcia v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DOES THE HOLDING IN HARRELL V. STATE, 894 So.2d 935 (Fla.2005), REQUIRE THAT A TRIAL COURT MUST ALLOW A DEFENDANT TO WITHDRAW HIS PLEA, EVEN WHERE THE STATE HAS PERFORMED ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE PLEA AGREEMENT, MERELY BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT INADVERTENTLY NEGLECTED TO STATE THAT IT HAD “ACCEPTED THE PLEA”?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.