35 So. 3d 564 - Medlin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. State · Evans v. State · 968 So. 2d 378 - Golden v. State · 944 So. 2d 103 - Brown v. State · Moss v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An indictment serves as notice to the defendant of the charges against him. When reviewing an indictment, we consider the substance of the indictment over the form of the indictment. There is no requirement that an indictment must include the statute number of the crimes charged. Thus, the statute number referenced in the indictment is of no consequence because we look to the substance of the indictment to determine whether it sufficiently gave notice of the pending- charges.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burgin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.