Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 SW2D 753 - Allen v. Lasseter

Allen v. Lasseter’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1990
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1990

7 state decisions

301931194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baines v. Mensing Bros. & Co. · Dossett v. Franklin Life Ins. · Wortman v. Young · Hendrix v. Hunn · Waggoner v. Zundelowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The authorities are in accord in holding that to entitle one to avoid a contract or settlement on the ground that he was induced to enter into it on the faith of false representations, it is essential that he should have been ignorant of the falsity of such representations, and should have relied on the truth thereof. If, before he acted upon such representations, he discovered that they were false, he cannot claim that he was deceived and thereby avoid such contract or settlement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.