Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 SW3D 516 - State v. Carruthers

State v. Carruthers’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
12
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 79 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bland · State v. Keen · State v. Chalmers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the `test' we employ [for comparative proportionality review] is so broad that nearly any sentence could be found proportionate; our review procedures are too subjective; and the `pool' of cases which are reviewed for proportionality is too small.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.