Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 TC 906 - Temkin v. Commissioner

Temkin v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
July 1992
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1992

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1601961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Raymond G. Burge and Kathleen E. Burge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Arthur Glickman Herman Glickman and Ruth Glickman and Aaron Glickmand and Freda Glickman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Sidney v. Commissioner · Weil v. Commissioner · Burge v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Treatment of gain to shareholders. — Gain from the sale or exchange (whether in liquidation or otherwise) of stock of a collapsible corporation, to the extent that it would be considered (but for the provisions of this subsection) as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset held for more than 6 months, shall, except as provided in paragraph (3), be considered as gain from the sale or exchange of property which is not a capital asset.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(ii) the realization by such shareholders of gain attributable to such property. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.