Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Tex. Crim. 472 - King v. State

35 Tex. Crim. 472 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1990
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1990

3 state decisions

1018961900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Being an absolute right, when the statute is complied with by the accused we will not look to the statement of facts, or anywhere else, to determine whether the testimony of [the co-defendant], if he had been acquitted, would have been material to the defendant. This is not required by law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.