Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 U.S. 368 - Thomas Crowell v. John Randell

Thomas Crowell v. John Randell’s Empirical Analysis

35 U.S. 368 · 1836

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
30
cited 30 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions (30 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably Illinois v. Gates (1983), Batson v. Kentucky (1986)

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

14018361840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin Fairfax v. Hunter's · Thompson Willson v. The Black Bird Creek Marsh Company · CRAIG v. the State of Missouri · Williams v. Norris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If both of these requirements do not appear on the record, the appellate jurisdiction fails.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal ... than such as appears on the face of the record”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that it is not necessary the question should appear on the record to have been raised, and the decision made in direct and positive terms, in ipsissimis verbis, but that it is sufficient' if it appears by clear and necessary intendment that the question must have been raised, and must have'been decided, in order to have induced the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.