Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 UTAH 596 - Peterson v. Budge

Peterson v. Budge’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 1969
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 1969

8 state decisions

401909191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. Whitney · Woodbury v. Woodbury · Cadwallader v. West · Unruh v. Lukens

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Thus, in transactions between persons occupying such relations, in which the stronger or superior party obtains a benefit or advantage, fraud is presumed, and the burden is cast upon the superior party to show fairness, adequacy, and equity in the transaction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.