Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Va. App. 413 - Cloutier v. Queen

35 Va. App. 413 - Cloutier v. Queen’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

25 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 2 Va. App. 178 - Venable v. Venable · 3 Va. App. 337 - Woolley v. Woolley · Potts v. Mathieson Alkali Works · 1 Va. App. 358 - Simmons v. Simmons · 7 Va. App. 472 - Holmes v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Simply put it is the conclusion of the Court that the best interest of the children will be served by permitting their relocation with their mother. Their economic circumstances will improve. They will have financial security. They will have a suitable and stable home environment. They will not be living on the edge. Secondly, they will remain with their primary caregiver. This is of great benefit to them as well. They will have a stay-at-home mother. That status would be in jeopardy otherwise. She simply cannot do so in Northern Virginia. They will enjoy a support system in Florida through the Mother which they do not have available here, both with their maternal grandmother relocating there and with the step-siblings that will become part of the family, the nuclear family because of marriage to Mr. Luther. Thirdly, ... it is not in the best interest of these children to retain the status quo because the status quo is changing and will continue to change because of the deteriorating economic situation. There is not going to be a status quo. Put differently, relocation is going to occur if not to Florida then to Prince William to Manassas Park or elsewhere. And this is not going to be, given the evidence, which has been presented to the Court, beneficial for these children. And that relocation to Manassas Park, Prince William, for example, will impact on the visitation enjoyed by Mr. Wheeler; it will make it more difficult. That will be a negative for these children. It will ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.