Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Va. App. 485 - Potts v. Commonwealth

35 Va. App. 485 - Potts v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Edwards v. Arizona · Escobedo v. Illinois · Gault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is desirable to have a parent, counsel or some other interested adult or guardian present when ... a juvenile waives fundamental constitutional rights and confesses to a serious crime ..., the mere absence of a parent or counsel does not render a waiver invalid.... [T]he presence or absence of a parent, guardian, independent interested adult, or counsel is ... [but one] factor to be considered in the totality of the circumstances....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.