Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Wash. App. 302 - State v. Hall

35 Wash. App. 302 - State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2007

15 state decisions

80198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · United States v. DiFrancesco · United States v. Sealy, Inc. · Roberts v. United States · 69 Wash. 2d 855 - State v. Loux

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that punishment already imposed must be fully credited when an appropriate sentence is entered for the offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whenever any person shall be convicted of any crime except murder, burglary in the first degree, arson in the first degree, robbery, carnal knowledge of a female child under the age of ten years, or rape, the court may in its discretion, at the time of imposing sentence upon such person, direct that such sentence be stayed and suspended until otherwise ordered by such court, and that the sentenced person be placed under the charge of a parole or peace officer during the term of such suspen sion, upon such terms as the court may determine: . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “RCW 9.95.210 reflects clearly the legislative intent that the granting of probation would include the imposition of such conditions as in the court's discretion will contribute to teaching personal discipline and the recognition of personal responsibility that are universally recognized as being necessary to the rehabilitation of the offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.