35 Wash. App. 552 - State v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2023
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow · 98 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. McCullum · 42 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Emmanuel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e cannot say that the average juror knows as a matter of common knowledge that 'attempt' contains the two separate elements.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'in no way affected the outcome of the case.’ ” (Quoting Wanrow, 88 Wn.2d at 237 .) This was especially true because, the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith · State v. Smith“[a] jury is not required to search other instructions to see if another element should have been included in the instruction defining the crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.