State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Taylor v. United States · 87 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Kroll · 93 Wash. 2d 436 - State v. Fitzsimmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any driver of a motor vehicle who wilfully fails or refuses to immediately bring his vehicle to a stop and who drives his vehicle in a manner indicating a wanton and wilful disregard for the lives or property of others while attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle, after being given a visual or audible signal to bring the vehicle to a stop, shall be guilty of a class C felony. The signal given by the police officer may be by hand, voice, emergency light, or siren. The officer giving such a signal shall be in uniform and his vehicle shall be appropriately marked showing it to be an official police vehicle.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“impossible to drive with the 'wanton and wilful disregard' prohibited by the felony flight statute without driving with the 'wilful or wanton disregard' which is the gravamen of reckless driving.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.