35 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably 114 Wash. 2d 153 - Snedigar v. Hoddersen (1990), 38 Wash. App. 847 - State v. Claflin (1984)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Specht v. Patterson · 92 Wash. 2d 755 - State v. Rhodes · 89 Wash. 2d 104 - Jacobsen v. State · 96 Wash. 2d 538 - Emwright v. King County · 89 Wash. 2d 916 - Herberg v. Swartz
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]n interpretation which gives effect to both provisions is the preferred interpretation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The orders in question contain only conclusionary findings relating to manifest injustice and do not set forth those portions of the record material to the disposition. . . . [T]he trial court should specify those factors set forth in RCW 13.40-.150,[ 1 ] or such other factors occurring in the record which impel the decision to go outside the standard range, and designate those portions of the social and legal files supporting the factors relied upon. ... . . . We will insist upon compliance with the rule hereafter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`very aware of the fact that the Probation Counsellor [sic] is recommending a Manifest Injustice,'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moro
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.