Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 Wash. App. 708 - State v. Hunter

35 Wash. App. 708 - State v. Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2006

15 state decisions

90198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Missouri v. Hunter · Britt v. North Carolina · 91 Wash. 2d 466 - State v. Foster · 84 Wash. 2d 498 - State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here, a legislature specifically authorizes cumulative punishment under two statutes, regardless of whether those two statutes proscribe the "same" conduct . . . the prosecutor may seek and the trial court or jury may impose cumulative punishment under such statutes in a single trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Every person who, in the commission of a burglary shall commit any other crime, may be punished therefor as well as for the burglary, and may be prosecuted for each crime separately.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “existence of the burglary antimerger statute `is an express statement that the legislature intended to punish separately any other crime committed during the course of a burglary.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.