Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 WIS 75 - Webster v. Moe

Webster v. Moe’s Empirical Analysis

1874

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
December 1908
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1908

6 state decisions

401874188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The action was for a trespass in cutting down and removing pine trees,” etc. . . . “But as soon as the decision in Single v. Schneider became known, the legislature passed ch. 263, Laws of 1873, prescribing what should be the measure of damages for the wrongful cutting of timber [trees],” and changed “the rule laid down in that case.” Webster v. Moe, 35 Wis. 77 , 79.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.