Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 WIS2D 369 - State Ex Rel. Klinkiewicz v. Duffy

State Ex Rel. Klinkiewicz v. Duffy’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 57 Wis. 2d 344 - Wold v. State (1973), 121 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Dunn (1984)

41 state decisions

1301967197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Braunfeld v. Gibbons · Levine v. Lacy · State Ex Rel. Kowaleski v. District Court of Milwaukee County · State v. Friedl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]he right to such an examination stems purely from statute and is not considered a constitutional right.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . if . . . a magistrate adjourns a preliminary examination for more than ten days without the consent of the accused, the magistrate loses jurisdiction. [However] . . . the state [is not precluded] from initiating a new prosecution for the same offense . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to restrain the exercise of judicial functions outside or beyond the jurisdiction of a court, or an official acting in a judicial capacity, where great hardship would otherwise result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.