Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 35 WIS2D 377 - State v. Reppin

State v. Reppin’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

207
cited by 207 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

207 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 207 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert (1986), 201 Wis. 2d 303 - State v. Bentley (1996)

207 state decisions

1080196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Douglas v. People of State of California · Kercheval v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 207 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]efore sentence, the court in its discretion may allow the defendant to withdraw his plea for any fair and just reason unless the prosecution has been substantially prejudiced by reliance upon the defendant's plea.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““ ‘. . . on timely application, the court will vacate a plea of guilty shown to have been unfairly obtained or given through ignorance, fear, or inadvertence. . . Kercheval v. United States (1927), 274 U. S. 220 , 47 Sup. Ct. 582, 71 L. Ed. 1009 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The test at this stage is not whether the defendant is guilty but whether he was fairly convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.