Ilo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Commonwealth v. Jimenez (2002), 2002 Pa. Super. 383 - Commonwealth v. Reppert (2002)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Harris · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richards v. Wisconsin · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department · Ganey v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the affidavit recites a mere isolated violation it would not be unreasonable to imply that probable cause dwindles rather quickly with the passage of time. However, where the affidavit properly recites facts indicating activity of a protracted and continuous nature, a course of conduct, the passage of time becomes less significant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wagner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.