Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 350 F.2d 592 - Atlass v. Atlass

Atlass v. Atlass’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2009

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

7019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. · Farrell v. United States · Braen v. Pfeifer Oil Transportation Co. · The 84-H · Schlichter v. Port Arthur Towing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The first is to ascertain whether any liability exists. If it is found to exist the second duty arises, which is to ascertain whether the loss or damage was occasioned or incurred without the ‘privity or knowledge’ of the owner of the ship. If no liability is found to exist, the absence of all liability is to be decreed, and there the matter ends.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Historically the duty of maintenance and cure derives from a seaman’s dependence on his ship.... Aside from gross misconduct or insubordination, what the seaman is doing and why and how he sustains injury does not affect his right to maintenance and cure, however decisive it may be as to claims for indemnity or for damages for negligence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Assuming that [the injured seamen] were in the course of their employment while departing from the yacht for the purpose of obtaining their meals and returning thereto in the normal manner, it certainly is a far-fetched idea that they continued in such course when they took to themselves the liberty of spending three near-midnight hours in a tavern consuming intoxicating liquors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.