Braude v. Wirtz’s Empirical Analysis
350 F.2d 702 · 1965
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Constructores Civiles De Centroamerica, S. A. v. Hannah (1972), Pesikoff v. Secretary of Labor (1974)
46 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co. · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy · Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley Authority · Fong Yue Ting v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In our view, appellants have shown neither a legal wrong nor a legal right to be free of the effects they attribute the determinations complained of will have upon their businesses. “We therefore conclude that the growers’ allegations are insufficient to show that they have suffered a ‘legal wrong’ or that they have been ‘adversely affected or aggrieved * * within the meaning of any relevant statute; and that as a necessary re- suit, they are without standing to sue.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action within the meaning of a relevant statute, is entitled to judicial review thereof.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““ . . .we are constrained to hold that no right of judicial review exists on the part of these nonresident aliens of determinations made by the executive branch acting pursuant to Congressional directive.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.