Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 350 F.3d 1045 - Nunes v. Ga Mueller

Nunes v. Ga Mueller’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably Lafler v. Cooper (2012), Lafler v. Cooper (2012)

2 district · 2 state decisions

300200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Younger v. Harris · Hill v. Lockhart · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim — (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding. " 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 (d)(1), (2) (emphasis added). Additionally, § 2254(e)(1) states: "a determination of a factual issue made by a State court shall be presumed to be correct. The applicant shall have the burden of rebutting the presumption of correctness by clear and convincing evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[f]ederal habeas corpus practice, as reflected by the decisions of this Court, indicates that a court has broad discretion in conditioning a judgment granting habeas relief. Federal courts are authorized, under 28 U.S.C. § 2243 , to dispose of habeas corpus matters `as law and justice require.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “modify the writ to order Nunes' release (that is, after all, the classic relief afforded by the writ) within a reasonable time unless the state provides the identical offer it made to Nunes earlier.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.