Taylor, Carolyn v. Small, Lawrence M.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 190 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 234 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Douglas v. Donovan (2009), Carter v. George Washington University (2004)
17 federal appellate · 190 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 29 U.S.C. § 794A · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Monge v. California · Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 234 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a significant change in employment status, such as hiring, firing, failing to promote, reassignment with significantly different responsibilities, or a decision causing significant change in benefits.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]n employer may cure an adverse employment action ... before that action is the subject of litigation”). 14 . In fact, Grafeld’s alleged comments about the plaintiffs personal appearance formed part of the basis of the plaintiff's first EEO complaint. PL’s Opp’n at 2-3. 15 . The plaintiff testified during her deposition that there were approximately eleven coaching sessions, each of which lasted approximately one hour. Pl.'s Opp’n, Ex. 1 at 101— 02. 16 . When asked if the coaching sessions were ever helpful, the plaintiff testified that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Because [the plaintiff] did not present any evidence upon which one could reasonably find she suffered an adverse employment action, the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of her employer ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.