Haoud v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
350 F.3d 201 · 2003
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Heckler v. Chaney · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Tarrawally v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under paragraph (2) [of 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)].”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Board's own regulation provides more than enough `law' by which a court could review the Board's decision to streamline,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“there is no way we can determine from the AWO whether the Board reviewed the case and found a legitimate way of distinguishing the [BIA's intervening decision] in denying Haoud's asylum claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ngure v. Ashcroft
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.