Haoud v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Ngure v. Ashcroft (2004), Lanza v. Ashcroft (2004)
20 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heckler v. Chaney · Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft · Magnolia Venture Capital Corp. v. Mississippi Department of Economic & Community Development · Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Tarrawally v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under paragraph [(a) (2)]”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“either the existence of changed circumstances which materially affect the applicant's eligibility for asylum or extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay in filing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the Board's own regulation provides more than enough `law' by which a court could review the Board's decision to streamline”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.