Nasir v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
350 F.3d 366 · 2003
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3563 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Turner v. Safley · Procunier v. Martinez · O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz · Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc. · Thornburgh v. Abbott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A `close' relationship for third-party standing must allow the third-party plaintiff to operate `fully, or very nearly, as effective a proponent,' of the potential plaintiff's rights as would the plaintiff himself. Such a situation arises, as described above, in professional contexts, where the rights of the potential plaintiff and third-party plaintiff neatly align.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“First, the regulation or practice in question must further an important or substantial governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of expression.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Koutnik v. Brown“courts have recognized a reasonable number of relationships that give rise to third-party standing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.