Gomez v. Jaimet’s Empirical Analysis
350 F.3d 673 · 2003
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Schlup v. Delo · Harris v. Reed · Massaro v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a case where the underlying constitutional violation claimed is ineffective assistance of counsel premised on a failure to present [such] evidence, a requirement that the new evidence be unknown to the defense at the time of trial would operate as a roadblock to the actual innocence gateway.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]n adequate and independent state ground bars federal habeas review of constitutional claims only if `the last state court rendering judgment in the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harrison v. McBride“All Schlup requires is that the new evidence is reliable and that it was not presented at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hancock v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.