Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 350 FSUPP 403 - Weaver v. O'GRADY

Weaver v. O'GRADY’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 1984

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

5019721980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Morrissey v. Brewer · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Stovall v. Denno · Goldberg v. Kelly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The establishment of prompt efficacious procedures to achieve legitimate state ends is a proper state interest worthy of cognizance in constitutional adjudication. But the Constitution recognizes higher values than speed and efficiency. Indeed, one might fairly say of the Bill of Rights in general, and the Due Process Clause in particular, that they were designed to protect the fragile values of a vulnerable citizenry from the overbearing concern for efficiency and efficacy that may characterize praiseworthy government officials no less, and perhaps more, than mediocre ones (footnotes omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““Once a motorist’s driver’s license and registration are suspended for failure to pay a judgment be cannot regain his license unless he obtains a stay of the judgment or satisfies it in full. He must get ‘proof of financial responsibility’ and maintain it for three years, as well as successfully pass a driver’s examination. O. R. C. Sec. 4509.40.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.