Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 350 N.C. 247 - State v. Goode

State v. Goode’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
3
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

65 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably State v. Lucas (2001), State v. Roache (2004)

65 state decisions

430199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · State v. Smith · Ohio v. Gallagher · State v. Hennis · Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) the crime was committed by some other person; (ii) the defendant knowingly advised, instigated, encouraged, procured, or aided the other person to commit that crime; and (iii) the defendant's actions or statements caused or contributed to the commission of the crime by that other person.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The communication or intent to aid does not have to be shown by express words of the defendant but may be inferred from his actions and from his relation to the actual perpetrators.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen the bystander is a friend of the perpetrator and knows that his presence will be regarded by the perpetrator as an encouragement and protection, presence alone may be regarded as an encouragement [of a crime].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.