Dunkley v. Shoemate’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vaughan v. J. P. Taylor Co. · 120 N.C. App. 529 - Johnson v. Amethyst Corp. · 113 N.C. App. 205 - University of North Carolina v. Shoemate · Thomas v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES · Haywood Street Redevelopment Corp. v. Peterson Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`no person has the right to appear as another's attorney without the authority to do so, granted by the party for which he [or she] is appearing'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a lawyer cannot properly represent a client with whom he has no contact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Snw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.