State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably State v. Golphin (2000), State v. Barden (2002)
3 federal appellate · 90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Conaway · State v. Bonnett · 125 N.C. App. 600 - T&T Development Co. v. Southern National Bank of South Carolina · 130 N.C. App. 154 - State v. Hayes · U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Scott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“motion in limine is insufficient to preserve for appeal the question of the admissibility of evidence if the defendant fails to further object to that evidence at the time it is offered at trial.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A], motion in limine is insufficient to preserve for appeal the question of the admissibility of evidence if the defendant fails to further object to that evidence at the time it is offered at trial. Rulings on motions in limine are preliminary in nature and subject to change at trial, depending on the evidence offered, and thus an objection to an order granting or denying the motion is insufficient to preserve for appeal the question of the admissibility of the evidence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a defendant must `object when the evidence that was the subject of the motion in limine [is] offered at trial . . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.