Marks v. Gessler’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 15481 (§ 301 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 15482 (§ 302 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 15483 (§ 303 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 15511 (§ 401 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 15512 (§ 402 of the Help America Vote Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 15801 (Coal Leasing Amendments) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Alexander v. Sandoval · Gonzaga University v. Doe · Blessing v. Freestone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In Colorado, parties to lawsuits benefit from a relatively broad definition of standing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“has traditionally been relatively easy to satisfy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.