Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 350 S.C. 1 - In Re Murph

In Re Murph’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Hall · In the Matter of Sifly · Matter of Thornton · Matter of Edwards · Matter of Wofford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An attorney usually does not abandon a license to practice law without a fight. Those who do must understand that “neglecting to participate [in a disciplinary proceeding] is entitled to substantial weight in determining the sanction.” ... An attorney’s failure to answer charges or appear to defend or explain alleged misconduct indicates an obvious disinterest in the practice of law. Such an attorney is likely to face the most severe sanctions because a central purpose of the disciplinary process is to protect the public from unscrupulous or indifferent lawyers.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “• Rule 7(a)(1) (violating the Rules of Professional Conduct) • Rule 7(a)(5) (engaging in conduct tending to pollute the administration of justice or to bring the courts or legal profession into disrepute or conduct demonstrating an unfitness to practice law) • Rule 7(a)(6) (violating the oath of office taken upon admission to the practice of law).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.