State v. Stone’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably State v. Laney (2006), State v. Bowman (2005)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eddings v. Oklahoma · Payne v. Tennessee · State v. Torrence · Shafer v. South Carolina · Kelly v. South Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Wfiien a juror conceals information inquired into during voir dire, a new trial is required only when the court finds the juror intentionally concealed the information, and that the information concealed would have supported a challenge for cause or would have been a material factor in the use of the party’s peremptory challenges.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bell · State v. Burgess“life imprisonment means until the death of the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Laney
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.