Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

350 So. 2d 1152

Peavy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1977

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1977-10-26

Relies on 333 So. 2d 457 - Alsdorf v. Broward County · Humphries v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-10-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably 441 So. 2d 682 - Sokol v. Sokol (1983), 505 So. 2d 432 - Sierra v. Sierra (1987)

52 state decisions

17019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SMITH, Judge.

¶1A conviction for auto theft. Although the trial court charged the jury that each material allegation of the information must be proved, and that those allegations included the defendant’s “intent to permanently deprive or defraud the true owner of the property of the use and benefit thereof,” the court did not repeat “permanently” when defining larceny. There was no objection. There was no fundamental error. Humphries v. State, 320 So.2d 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert, den., 333 So.2d 463 (Fla. 1976).

¶2AFFIRMED.'

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
/350/so2d/1152 · .json · Public domain