Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

350 So. 2d 1164

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 23, 1977

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1977-09-23

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1989

6 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“"Writ recalled. We can not conclude at this stage that the trial judge erred in determining that severance is not required to assure a fair determination of defendant's guilt or innocence of each offense." 350 So.2d 1164 (La.1977).”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 383 So. 2d 1 - State v. Harris

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-09-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Writ recalled. We cannot conclude at this stage that the trial judge erred in determining that severance is not required to assure a fair determination of defendant’s guilt or innocence of each offense.

TATE and DENNIS, JJ., dissent.
/350/so2d/1164 · .json · Public domain