¶1We have for review by certiorari a decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, Britton v. State, 339 So.2d 256, which allegedly conflicts with the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in Lomax v. State, 322 So.2d 650.
¶2Subsequent to the filing of this petition for certiorari, we quashed the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second Dis*462trict, in Lomax v. State, supra. See Lomax v. State, 345 So.2d 719 (Fla.1977).
¶3We approve the decision of the District Court of Appeal, First District, in the case sub judice. The writ of certiorari is therefore discharged.
¶4It is so ordered.