Strong v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 256th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Worford v. Stamper · City of Brownsville v. Alvarado · Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone · Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint Venture · Gillespie v. Gillespie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A movant's mere allegations will not suffice to obtain a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence; rather, admissible evidence must be introduced at a hearing on the motion for new trial establishing such essential facts as no prior knowledge on the part of the movant, the prior diligence exercised by the movant, and the nature of the newly discovered evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re JP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.