Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

351 Ark. 214

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 21, 2002

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 2002-11-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 2003

2 state decisions

Relies on Rogers v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Appellant, Harmon Williams, by and through his attorney, David Mark Gunter, has filed a motion for rule on clerk to lodge the record in this appeal. Because the record was tendered later than the seven months from the date of judgment, we treat his motion as one for a belated appeal. See Ark. R. App. P. — Crim. 4; Ark. R. App. P. — Civ. 5. Attorney Gunter states in the motion that he accepts full responsibility for tendering the record beyond the seven-month period for filing. He further admits that he should have filed a partial record and moved for an extension of time before the seven months from date of judgment rah.

¶2 We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

¶3The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

/351/ark/214 · .json · Public domain