United States v. Crowder’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.2d 101 · 1965
Citation profile
18 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently March 1990
18 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co. · Ewing v. United States · Gordon v. United States · Gordon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Ordinarily the district court may in its discretion determine a motion for new trial upon affidavits without more. Ewing v. United States, 1942, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 14, 135 F.2d 633, 638. There are, however, exceptional cases in which an oral hearing should be granted. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In this case the district judge heard Tucker's testimony before the jury * * *. This same witness now has undertaken by affidavit to change his story * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.