Coleman v. Maxwell’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.2d 285 · 1965
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2001 · most notably WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDEN (1971), Allen v. Perini (1970)
24 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Fay v. Noia · Brown v. Allen · Linkletter v. Walker · McBee v. Bomar
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is clear to this court that once an issue of asserted federal constitutional violation has been presented to the highest state court in the state concerned, that the doctrine of exhaustion of remedies does not require futile repetitive presentation to such court by repeated attempts through a variety of motions, (citing cases.)” 351 F.2d at 286 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ingram v. Wingo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.