No 20201’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2008
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isserman v. Ethics Committee of Essex County Bar Ass'n · Schauffler ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1291, International Longshoremen's Ass'n · Lewis v. National Labor Relations Board · Hourihan v. National Labor Relations Board · Frito Co., Western District v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a district court ... finds that the threatened harm or disruption can best be avoided through an injunction.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be given an opportunity to appear by counsel and present any relevant testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.