Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F.2d 651 - Schmid v. United States

Schmid v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

351 F.2d 651 · 1965

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. v. United States (1969), J. L. Simmons Co. v. United States (1969)

1 federal appellate ·

18019651970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 41 U.S.C. § 322

Relies on J. D. Hedin Construction Co. v. United States · United States v. Rice · 69 F. Supp. 409 - George A. Fuller Co. v. United States · Laburnum Construction Corp. v. United States · Jack Stone Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The covenant in the Disputes clause, which requires the contractor to proceed with the work pursuant to the contracting officer’s orders pending an administrative appeal, is a provision inserted in the contract for the benefit of the government. The purpose of the covenant is to prevent an interruption of the work and a consequent loss or detriment to the government while the administrative proceedings are in progress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “where government-caused delays force the contractor into more costly operations, the government will have to respond in damages for the resulting additional outlays”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.