Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F.2d 794 - Mackey v. United States

Mackey v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

351 F.2d 794 · 1965

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 1995 · most notably Powell v. United States (1965), Robinson v. United States (1972)

28 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

2601965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hirabayashi v. United States · Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. City of Burlington · Stevan v. Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia · Greenwell v. United States · Smith v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “retaining jurisdiction, for a hearing on the reasonableness and the effects, if any, of the delay between the offenses and the arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.