Jackson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.2d 821 · 1965
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably Powell v. United States (1965), United States v. Feinberg (1967)
41 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Nardone v. United States · Humble Pipe Line Co. v. Waggonner · Prado Oil & Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Ross v. United States · Nickens v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a purposeful delay of seven months between offense and arrest, (2) a plausible claim [by defendant] of inability to recall or reconstruct the events. . ., and (3) . . . the [State's] case . . . [as] consist[ing] of the recollection of one witness refreshed by a notebook.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Clapp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.