Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 351 F.2d 840 - Wilson v. Harris

Wilson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

351 F.2d 840 · 1965

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 1978
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Hamilton v. Alabama · White v. State of Maryland · 54 Cal. 2d 498 - People v. Elliot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Under California law a preliminary examination is not in and of itself a critical stage in the judicial proceedings such as to constitutionally require the appointment of counsel at all such hearings; (2) a California preliminary hearing may be 'critical' however, under the circumstances of a particular case * * *; (3) such a hearing is critical if the events which transpire at that hearing are likely to prejudice the effectiveness of legal assistance in the subsequent proceedings. * * *”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Thus, the thrust of Powell's admonition that an accused has a right to counsel `at every step in the proceedings against him,' as borne out by subsequent decisions, including Hamilton and White, seems to be that if the effectiveness of legal assistance ultimately furnished an accused is likely to be prejudiced by its prior denial, the earlier period may be deemed a critical stage in the judicial process and a conviction obtained in such circumstances is rendered invalid. We find nothing in the Supreme Court decisions, however, that would permit us to extend the duty of the State to appoint counsel in proceedings where even the likelihood of later prejudice arising from the failure to appoint is absent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Whatever may be the function and importance of arraignment in other jurisdictions, we have said enough to show that in Alabama it is a critical stage in a criminal proceeding. What happens there may affect the whole trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.