Benoit v. Gardner’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.2d 846 · 1965
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 12 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284
Relies on Dombrowski v. Pfister · Snowden v. Hughes · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · Ex parte Poresky · Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Djoes not encompass injunctions sought on the ground that a valid statute or order is being executed in a manner prejudicial to constitutional rights.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.