Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

351 F.2d 949

Docket No. 21831.

Chester v. Ross

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-10-29

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1965

2 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-10-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wesley R. Asinof, H. A. Stephens, Jr., Charles R. Smith, James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.

Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, Joseph Kovner, Lee A. Jackson, George F. Lynch, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles L. Goodson, U.S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BELL and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The judgment of the trial court dismissing the amended complaint is AFFIRMED in all respects except as to the claim of B. M. Chester. It appearing that no tax claim is pending against B. M. Chester, it would be appropriate for the trial court to consider his contention that part of the property seized under the jeopardy assessment belonged to him in the pending litigation. No good reason appears why a new suit should be required for this purpose. The case is remanded, therefore, to the trial court to permit that court to consider the claim of appellant, B. M. Chester.

¶2

The order of dismissal as to the other appellants is affirmed.

/351/f2d/949 · .json · Public domain