Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater’s Empirical Analysis
351 F.3d 1112 · 2003
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2020 · most notably Coral Springs Street Systems, Inc. v. City of Sunrise (2004), CAMP Legal Defense Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta (2006)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Sierra Club v. Morton · Bennett v. Spear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) an injury in fact, meaning an injury that is concrete and particularized, and actual or imminent, (2) a causal connection between the injury and the causal conduct, and (3) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]ime limits are required when their lack could result in censorship of certain viewpoints or ideas, but are not categorically required when the permitting scheme is content-neutral.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An 'injury in fact’ requires the plaintiff to 'show that he personally has suffered some actual or threatened injury.’”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.